Page 175 - CW E-Magazine (29-7-2025)
P. 175

Special Report                                                                   Special Report



    Ultrasonic testing equipment pro-  the tape not in the scale. Also, if a C  can provide both elemental and phase  oxyhydroxides, aluminium oxides, copper
 vides almost instantaneous results.  or Au coating is used to provide elec-  identifi cation  of  the  sample  from  corrosion products and zirconium
    Other vital information, such  as   trical conductivity, the low energy  exactly same location. Such an approach  oxides on  a metal surface. However,
 thickness, dimensional measure-  x-rays will be suppressed, and any  can be quite useful for multi-coloured  not all metal oxides or sulphides have
 ments, shape variations,  etc.,  can   data reduction can be skewed.  scales and spatial distribution analyses.  the necessary molecular  vibrations or
 also be obtained.                                                        excitations for detection.
    Automated imaging systems  can   Another issue with EDS analyses is  Bulk analysis of corrosion products
 be used to produce detailed visual   the requirement of a suffi  cient accele-  Although an EDS  analysis can  CONCLUSIONS
 images of pipeline fl aws.  rating voltage to  excite the  requisite  provide local elemental analyses, it is   Corrosion is one  of the  greatest
       x-rays. In addition, there can be peak  sometimes quite useful to obtain a bulk  issues plaguing industries that  rely
 Limitations of ultrasonic testing  overlap that can make data interpreta-  quantitative analysis of the scale. Such  heavily on  piping distribution net-
 While ultrasonic testing is eff ective   tion diffi  cult and force reliance on soft-  information can be used to identify and  works. If left unchecked,  corrosion
 at detecting the early onset of cracking   ware for diff erentiating.  quantify trace elements or the potential  deteriorates  the pipe’s wall thickness,
 and other structural defects, it is essen-  metal source for the deposit if it was no  which can lead to loss of structural
 tial  for asset owners to understand   X-ray Diff raction (XRD)  longer adherent to the metal. Potential  integrity, product loss and in extreme
 the limitations of this technology to   EDS  analysis provides elemental  instrumental techniques include x-ray  cases, ruptures and explosion.
 ensure best results are obtained. Some   information such as Fe and O but can-  fl uorescence  (XRF)  and  inductively
 common limitations include:  not diff erentiate whether the corrosion  coupled plasma (ICP-MS)  atomic   Early detection of corrosion in criti-
    The pipeline must be accessible to   products are hematite  or  magnetite.  adsorption spectroscopy (AAS). Various  cal pipeline distribution networks  by
 transmit the ultrasonic sound waves.  Such  identifi cation  can  be  done  with  chromatographic instrumentation  can  using the above NDTs can mean the
    This  technique requires more skill   XRD.  With  this  technique  the  angles  also be used to detect and quantify ion  diff erence  between  minor  repairs  and
 and training than some other testing   Fig. 10: Shows elemental energy dispersive X-ray microanalyses from a mineral   and intensities of x-rays diff racted from  constituents in corrosion deposits such  costly replacement of expensive assets.
 particle ~2 μm diameter
 methods.  the planes of the crystalline  structure  as Cl , F , CO ,  and NH . However,
                                             -
                                                              4+
                                                     2-
                                                -
                                                    3
    Materials that are rough, very small  and to determine the corrective action  assumed  instrumental  parameters  are unique, allowing for the identifi ca-  special sample preparation is required  REFERENCES
 or very thin can be diffi  cult to ins-  required to prevent future occurrences.   (Figure-10).  tion of the various  compounds in the  for these techniques(3, 7).  1.  Peabody, A.W., “Control of Pipe-
 pect or produce erroneous results.  However, the analysis of any sample is   corrosion scale.  line Corrosion”, Edited by-Bian-
    Testing equipment requires frequent  only as good as what is being analysed   Often the initial EDS analysis is   Surface analysis of corrosion products  chetti, R.L., Second edition, NACE
 calibration in accordance with suit-  because many oxide and  sulphide  done for the corrosion product on a   Elemental analysis via XRD is very   Surface analysis techniques such as   International  – The  Corrosion
 able reference standards.  corrosion products are very susceptible  metal or fracture surface. This can pro-  useful  for  identifi cation  of  compounds  Angular  Electron  Spectroscopy  (AES)   Society, (2001).
    Cast iron pipes (or pipes construc-  to degradation upon atmospheric  vide  information  as  to which  metals   present because atomic substitution will  or  X-Ray  Photoelectron  Spectroscopy  2.  Fontana,  M.G., and Green, N.D.,
 ted from other rough materials) can  exposure(7).  (C, O, F, S or Cl) are present; but the   produce a small lattice strain that can be  (XPS)  can  provide  information  on  the   ‘Corrosion Engineering’,  (1967),
 be  diffi  cult  to  inspect  due  to  low   exact composition of the corrosion   diffi  cult to detect. For example, substi-  outer  atomic  layers.  In  addition,  XPS   McGraw Hill Book Company.
                +2
 sound transmission or high signal to  Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy  product cannot be concluded. Although   tution of Ca  ions into FeCO  may not  can determine the binding energy of ele-  3.  Roberge, P.R., “Corrosion Inspec-
                              3
 noise ratio.  (EDS)  the x-rays that are analysed come from   be detectable. Because the shape of crys-  ments present on the surface, which can   tion  & Monitoring”,  Wiley-Inter-
 EDS, associated with a scan-  the surface, they are emitted from an   tals of corrosion products/scale tends to  provide information  on their  chemical   science (2007).
 The proper method (straight or  ning electron microscope (SEM), is  excluded volume that can be several   be platy, fi brous or tabular, they may not  state.  These techniques are extremely  4.  Branko,  N.P., Kumarguru, S.P.,
 angle beam) needs to be employed  the most common technique used for  microns deep.  This excluded volume   randomly orient during sample prepa-  useful for analysing thin protective   “Cathodic protection of Pipelines”,
 to ensure that all pipe defects are  chemical  identifi cation  of  corrosion  can include the base metal or multiple   ration, which can cause some planes to  scales, multi-layer deposits and sub-sur-  Handbook  of  Environmental
 captured.  products. EDS can detect elements C  layers of the corrosion scale, particu-  produce a greater intensity ratio than  face diff usion into the base metal. Depth   Degradation of Materials, Chapter
 through U with a detectability limit of  larly coming from piping scale.  others and impact the quantisation from  profi ling is a useful XPS technique, but   24, pp: 503-521, (2005).
 Analysing corrosion products for   about 0.1 weight percent. The scanned   peak  intensity  ratios.  Quantifi cation  of  interpretation can be muddled by ion  5.  API Publication 570, Piping Ins-
 failure analysis  electron beam interacts with the   Removal of the scale from the base   the various components requires a refi ne-  mixing from the sputtering process.  pection Code – Inspection, Repair,
 Many techniques such as scanning  specimen’s surface, which  produces  metal or fracture surface can provide a   ment  where  a  least  squares  analysis  is   Alteration,  and  Rerating  of
 electron  microscopy (SEM), energy  secondary and back-scattered electrons  more realistic analysis of the corrosion   used to refi ne a theoretical pattern until   Fourier  Transform Infrared Spectro-  In-Service  Piping  Systems,
 dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDS)  and x-rays.  These x-rays are charac-  product chemistry. The use of acetone-  it matches with the measured pattern.  scopy (FTIR) and Raman Imaging and   American Petroleum Institute.
 and  x-ray  diff raction  (XRD)  can  be  teristic for the element that emits them  softened cellulose acetate replicating   Spectroscopy (RIS) are often  used to  6.  NDT Global Pipeline Diagnosis &
 employed to provide vital information  and can be used to identify the elemen-  tape is an excellent  technique to  re-  When the sample quantity is small,  identify organic compounds in corro-  Inspection  –  https://www.ndt-
 about corrosion products. Analysis and  tal composition of corrosion products.  move the scale from the base metal. If   dispersing the corrosion products onto  sion products. Both techniques can   global.com.
 identifi cation of corrosion products is a  Unless standards are used, the analysis  the tape procedure is used, an unused   a glass slide can often produce a satis-  analyse micro-volumes. RIS  can also  7.  Collacott, R.A, ‘Mechanical Fault
 critical component of a failure analysis  produces semi-quantitative analysis  portion should be analysed to identify   factory  diff raction  pattern.  Combin-  be  used  to  diff erentiate  the  various   Diagnosis and Condition Monitor-
 in order to conclude  the  root cause  based on the computer software and  potential contaminant elements from   ing  micro-focused  XRD  with  SEM  surface iron oxides, hydroxides and   ing’, Chapman and Hall, 1977.


 174  Chemical Weekly  July 29, 2025  Chemical Weekly  July 29, 2025                                   175


                                      Contents    Index to Advertisers    Index to Products Advertised
   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180