Page 183 - CW E-Magazine (9-4-2024)
P. 183

Special Report                                                                   Special Report


 Table 1: Methods of calculating Scope 3 emissions   However,  if  the  emissions  associ-  uniform data collection formats and  that corporations currently collaborate  dardise the exchange of carbon emis-
 Calculation method  Description  ated with the purchased goods are   maintaining data quality across diverse  with offer a one-time summary of  sions data.
 Spend based method  Calculating  a  fi rm’s  indirect  emissions  from  its   reduced and accurately accounted for,   suppliers. Efforts to address this chal-  spend-based Scope 3 computations. It   Scope 3 Emissions Decision Tree
       lenge include industry initiatives  that  is imperative  for companies  to lever-
 the  company can demonstrate  an in-
 purchased goods/services.  crease in  production concurrent with   standardise methodologies for calcula-  age this as a benchmark for analysing   The GHG Protocol provides a Scope
 Fuel based method   Calculating emissions by identifying fuel types and   a decrease in emissions. This scenario   ting product carbon footprint.   top suppliers for  targeted data collec-  3 Emissions Decision Tree to navigate
 quantities used, and applying relevant emission   underscores  the importance  of accu-  tion, rather than confi ning the estima-  the intricacies of supplier data. The tree
 factors.  rate emissions accounting in achieving   GHG Protocol for scope 3 emissions   tion-based data solely for reporting  prioritises  the  use  of  supplier-specifi c
 Activity based method  Calculating emissions through value chain activity   sustainability targets while maintaining   The  GHG  Protocol  offers  guide-  purposes. Obtaining precise emissions  methods, emphasising their  reliability
 analysis and relevant emission factor application.  business growth.  lines for calculating Scope 3 emissions,  data can pose a challenge, and the arti-  and accuracy, ultimately positively infl u-
 Supplier specifi c calcula- Calculation  by  gathering  product-level  GHG  data   delineating two types of data applicable  fi cial intelligence capabilities promised  encing the brand image. Following the
 tion method   from all suppliers.  Accurate,  supplier-specifi c  data  is   to this process: primary and secondary  by software companies cannot replace  steps  outlined  in  the  GHG  Protocol
 Hybrid method   Calculated with a combination of various Scope 3   pivotal for such decisions, encompass-  data  (GHG  Protocol  team,  2011).  data directly procured from your own  decision tree empowers companies  to
 methods using supplier-specifi c and secondary data.  ing factors like the use of recycled raw   Primary data, directly furnished  by  suppliers.  make informed decisions that faithfully
 (Terrascope Team, 2023)  materials, energy  sources, and other   suppliers or other sources, pertains to   represent the emissions of their supply
 unique  considerations. As  Tier-1  sup-  specifi c activities within the company’s   Nonetheless, by instituting an effec-  chain, contributing meaningfully to
 which intends to expand its business  sions associated with procuring the raw  pliers increasingly base their purchas-  value  chain.  For  instance,  PepsiCo  tive procedure for gathering and verify-  the overarching goal of reducing their
 and augment the production of Product  material  required for its manufacture  ing decisions on carbon footprint, this   utilised  primary data  to comprehend  ing data from your suppliers in accor-  carbon footprint.
 X.  This  company  has  set  a  target,  are also likely  to rise, given  that  the  infl uence  permeates  through  the  sup-  the actual emissions of Tropicana and  dance with international standards, you
 approved  by  the  Science-Based Targets  emissions methodology is intrinsically  ply chain, establishing a feedback loop   monitor  the  progress of supply chain  can ensure access to dependable and  Confi dentiality of supplier data
 initiative  (SBTi),  to  reduce  its  Scope  linked to the quantity of material pur-  that accentuates the demand for precise   decarbonisation. Conversely, secondary  precise  information.  This  will  aid  in   As companies delve into the collec-
 3 emissions by 20% by the year 2030.  chased.  This  correlation  renders  the  data.  While  gathering  accurate  data   data encompasses industry aver-  making informed  decisions regarding  tion  of  detailed,  supplier-specifi c  data
 As  Company A  continues  to  increase  achievement of the SBTi target increas-  from the supply chain is a critical step,   ages  from  databases  like  GaBi  and  your sustainability initiatives. Further-  for  Scope  3  emissions,  safeguarding
 the production of Product X, the emis-  ingly challenging.  the broader challenge lies in  ensuring   EcoInvent,  or  fi ndings  from  literature  more, this could have a direct infl uence  confi dentiality emerges as a paramount
       studies available online. The GHG Pro-  on  your  future  fi nancial  performance,  concern. This data holds strategic busi-
       tocol’s decision tree underscores a criti-  particularly  in light of the escalating  ness insights and must be handled with
       cal challenge for companies employing  tax implications associated with carbon  care to prevent misuse. However, with
       supplier-specifi c methods: ensuring the  emissions.                the implementation of appropriate mea-
 Co 2  CH 4  N O  HFCS  PFCS  SF 6  NF 3  availability and quality of data to align   sures, companies can strike a balance,
 2
       with business objectives.         Balancing specifi city and accuracy  ensuring accessibility  for accurate
                                           When gathering  data from  suppli-  emissions calculation, while preserving
 Scope 2  Scope 1  While many companies effectively  ers, there’s a delicate balance between  confi dentiality.  Establishing  trust  with
 INDIRECT  DIRECT  assess emissions using industry-ave-  specifi city  and  accuracy.  The  specifi -  suppliers becomes  pivotal in navigat-
       rage databases, complications arise  city of the collected data, tailored to the  ing these challenges. This involves for-
       when a substantial part of the inventory  purchased product or service, hinges  malising agreements through legal con-
       is comprised of suppliers with limited  on the reliability of the supplier’s data  tracts and aligning internal data usage
 Scope 3  Scope 3  resources  to  provide  data.  The  80-20  sources and the level of detail in the in-  policies with the interests of suppliers.
 INDIRECT  INDIRECT
       rule posits that 80% of Scope 3 emis-  formation gathered. Ensuring the accu-  It is noteworthy that as more companies
 purchased  sions stem from 20% of suppliers; how-  racy of collected data requires substan-  seek supplier-specifi c data, reciprocity
 goods and  transportation
 services  purchased electricity,   and distribution  ever, in numerous instances, this 20%  tial effort to validate that the supplier’s  in legal agreements can be encouraged
 steam heating & cooling   leased  investments  can represent over 50 suppliers, making  allocation method aligns with industry  when sharing data as a supplier.
 for own use  assets  company
 capital   facilities  it a formidable task to monitor emis-  standards. The risk of the data not truly
 goods  franchises  sions from each one (Laoyan, 2022).  representing the emissions of the sup-  Leveraging technology for primary
 employee  processing of
 fuel and   commuting  sold products     ply chain underscores the need for a  data sharing
 energy related
 activities  business  According  to the Greenhouse  Gas  robust process to guarantee  data qua-  Corporate   sustainability   teams
 travel  company  use of sold  leased assets
 transportation  vehicles  products  (GHG) Protocol, there exist four metho-  lity. In this landscape, initiatives like the  across organisations strive to concen-
 and distribution  waste   end-of-life
 generated in   treatment of  dologies  for  emissions  calculation.  Partnership  for  Carbon  Transparency  trate their initiatives in areas where
 operations  sold products
       However, organisations have predomi-  (PACT) hosted by the World Business  the return on investment is substantial.
 Upstream activities  Reporting company  Downstream activities  nantly concentrated their efforts  on  Council  for  Sustainable  Development  However, the process of gathering sup-
       the spend-based method. The majority  (WBCSD)  play  an  important  role  in  plier-specifi c data for the calculation of
 Fig. 1: Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 emissions
 (GHG Protocol Team, 2013)  of consultants or  software providers  creating a global standard that can stan-  Scope 3 emissions can be both labour-
 182  Chemical Weekly  April 9, 2024  Chemical Weekly  April 9, 2024                                   183


                                      Contents    Index to Advertisers    Index to Products Advertised
   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188